Voices in Urban Education
Archives
Redesigning the “Central Office”
VUE Number 22, Winter 2009
| VUE Home | Archives | Order Print Copy |
Resources
American Institutes for Research and SRI
International. 2004. National School District and
Network Grants Program, Year 2 Evaluation Report. Washington, DC: AIR and SRI.
> Full report
American Institutes for Research and SRI
International. 2003. High Time for High School
Reform: Early Findings from the Evaluation of
the National School District and Network Grants
Program. Washington, DC: AIR and SRI.
> Executive summary
Annenberg Institute for School Reform. 2002. School Communities that Work for Results and
Equity. Providence, RI: Brown University, Annenberg
Institute for School Reform.
> Full report
Bryan, L. L., and C. I. Joyce. 2007. Mobilizing
Minds: Creating Wealth from Talent in the 21st
Century Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
> Overview, reviews, ordering
Burch, P., and J. Spillane. 2004. Leading from the
Middle: Mid-Level District Staff and Instructional
Improvement. Chicago: Cross-City Campaign for
Urban School Reform.
Cawelti, G., and N. Protheroe. 2003. High Student
Achievement: How Six School Districts Changed
into High Performance Systems. Arlington, VA:
Educational Research Services.
Corbett, H. D., and L. B. Wilson. 1992. “The Central Office Role in Instructional
Improvement,” School Effectiveness and School
Improvement 3, no. 1:45-68.
> Abstract, ordering
Darling-Hammond, L., J. Ancess, and S. W. Ort. 2002. “Reinventing High School: Outcomes of
the Coalition Campus Schools Project,” American
Educational Research Journal 39, no. 3:639-673.
Elmore, R. F. 2000. Building a New Structure
for School Leadership. Washington, DC: Albert
Shanker Institute.
> Full report
Honig, M. I. Under review. “Beyond Technical
Assistance: ‘External’ Organizations and the
Dynamics of Urban District Central Office
Leadership.”
Honig, M. I. In press. “No Small Thing: School
District Central Office Bureaucracies and the
Implementation of New Small Autonomous
Schools Initiatives,” American Educational Research
Journal.
Honig, M. I. 2006. “Street-Level Bureaucracy
Revisited: Frontline District Central Office
Administrators as Boundary Spanners in
Education Policy Implementation,” Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis 28, no. 4:357-383.
> Full report
Honig, M. I. 2004. “District Central Office
Community Partnerships: From Contracts
to Collaboration to Control.” In Educational
Administration, Policy, and Reform: Research and
Measurement, edited by W. Hoy & C. Miskel,
pp. 59-90. Greenwich, CT: Information Age
Publishing.
Massell, D., and M. Goertz. 1999. District Strategies
for Building Capacity and the Influence of State
Policy on Local Initiatives. Philadelphia: Consortium
for Policy Research in Education.
Murphy, J., and P. Hallinger. 1988. “Characteristics
of Instructionally Effective Districts,” Journal of
Educational Research 81, no. 3:175-81.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development. 2007. Program for International
Student Assessment, 2006: Science Competencies
for Tomorrow’s World. Executive Summary. Paris:
OECD.
Raywid, M. A. 2002. “The Policy Environments
of Small Schools and Schools-Within-Schools,” Educational Leadership 59, no. 5:47-51.
> Abstract
Raywid, M. A., G. Schmerler, S. E. Phillips, and
G. A. Smith. 2003. Not So Easy Going: The Policy
Environments of Small Urban Schools and Schools-
Within-Schools. Charleston, SC: ERIC Clearinghouse
on Rural Education and Small Schools.
Shannon, G. S., and P. Bylsma. 2004. Characteristics
of Improved School Districts: Themes from Research. Olympia, WA: Office of the Superintendent of
Public Instruction.
Snipes, J., F. Doolittle, and C. Herlihy. 2002. Foundations for Success: Case Studies of How Urban
School Systems Improve Student Achievement. Washington, DC: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation and Council of the Great
City Schools.
> Executive summary
Sporte, S., M. Correa, J. Kahne, and J. Q. Easton. 2003. Chicago High School Redesign Initiative:
A Snapshot of the First Year of Implementation. Chicago: Consortium for Chicago School Reform.
> Full report
Springboard Schools. 2006. Minding the Gap: New Roles for School Districts in the Age of Accountability. San Francisco, CA: Springboard Schools.
> Scroll to order PDF
Togneri, W., and S. Anderson. 2003. Beyond
Islands of Excellence: What Districts Can Do to
Improve Instruction and Achievement in All Schools. Washington, DC: Learning First Alliance.
> Description, download PDF
Tyack, D. 1974. The One Best System: A History
of American Urban Education. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
> Description, table of contents, ordering
Ucelli, M., E. Foley, and J. Mishook. 2007. “Smart Districts as the Entry Points to Smart Education
Systems.” In City Schools: How Districts and
Communities Can Create Smart Education Systems, edited by R. Rothman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
Education Press.
> Description, introduction, ordering
Wallach, C. A., and C. Gallucci. 2004. Elevating
the Conversation: Building Professional Community
in Small High Schools. Seattle, WA: Small Schools
Project.
> Full report
Wallach, C. A., and R. Lear. 2003. An Early Report
on Comprehensive High School Conversions. Seattle,
WA: Small Schools Project.
© all material AISR